“The Manchurian
Candidate”
Paramount Pictures
Directed by Jonathan Demme
Screenplay by Daniel Pyne and
Dean Georgaris, based
on the 1962 screenplay by George
Axelrod and the
novel by Richard Condon
Produced by Jonathan Demme, Scott Rudin and Tina
Sinatra
Starring Denzel Washington, Meryl Streep, Liev Schreiber,
Kimberly Elise, Vera Farminga, Jon Voight and Robyn
Hitchcock
(out
of four)
The first “Manchurian Candidate” was
a searing indictment of the fearful hatred of HUAC
and other freedom-limiting participants in the anti-communist
movement, swiftly arguing that those who use their
tactics have more in common with tyrannical communist
regimes than those who called for more reasonable
methods. Jonathan Demme’s new remake doesn’t
make the same case against the corporations that
want to control modern politics, but it does adequately
explore the concept of executives manipulating politics
in the name of making some money.
The hero, Major Ben Marco, whom Frank Sinatra portrayed
in 1962 version, is in the skilled hands of Denzel
Washington, who builds on a character who doesn’t
know which part of his mind to trust. He remembers
his “friend,” Raymond Shaw (Liev Schreiber),
rescuing himself and most of his fellow soldiers
in a Desert Storm combat mission that won Shaw the
very exclusive National Medal of Honor. All those
still alive remember Shaw with nothing but fondness,
but the opening sequence shows that Raymond was completely
inept at being friendly with his fellow soldiers,
and the memory of his heroic rescue and warm friendship
feels more scripted than experienced.
Marco’s doubts and nightmares are written
off as stress disorders and effects of Gulf War Syndrome
that seem destined to ruin his military career. But
one of Marco’s fellow soldiers, much further
gone mentally, has been having the same dreams.
The film begins at a political convention (the event
where the original climaxes) for an unidentified
political party that looks like the Democratic one
based on a map of where they need to pick up electoral
votes. Meryl Streep plays Senator Eleanor Shaw, whose
war hero son Raymond is now a congressman who she
pushes into the nomination for vice president. (Raymond’s
step father, the veep candidate from the first film,
isn’t present here.) Eleanor argues for Raymond’s
nomination with a take-charge speech from Steep convincing
them.
The story varies from the original film’s
in several moments, which works to the film’s
advantage. While the previous dynamics worked better
in many moments, the new story is difficult to predict,
with unknown elements leaving things uncertain. The
target, not hit quite as heavily as the anti-communists
of the 1962 film, is corporations that aim to control
political leaders. Manchurian Global is a corporation
whose contracted guide to troops (the great British
singer Robyn Hitchcock, surprisingly creepy) appeared
to knock out Marco before Shaw practiced his heroics.
The idea that corporations control elected officials
with generous campaign donations is common knowledge,
so hypnosis is the next logical step.
 |
|
| |
|
Demme and production designer Kristi Zea also skewer
the media’s and the political parties’ use
of ridiculous graphics. At one point, the ticker
below the screen begins quoting a speaker before
he’s done speaking—a gag that almost
loses its impact because cable news networks do it
so often.
Marco’s love interest, Rosie (Kimberly Elise),
played by Janet Leigh in the original, loses all
the mystery and oddball dialogue of Leigh’s
character. While Elise’s performance is fine,
the film explains all the motives of a character
who was great in the original precisely because we
didn’t know for certain where she stood and
what her motives were. Many of the remake’s
weaknesses actually come from an eagerness to explain
areas that the other film left unanswered.
The original book and movie are often credited with
introducing the concept of brainwashing into mainstream
culture. Now, the concept is familiar, and the process
involves a series of TVs and pipes inserted into
people’s heads.
John Frankenheimer’s direction of the original
film is remarkable, with shots such as a 360 degree
pan of a room that creates the confusion of location
of the hypnotized troops. Demme is in top form in
terms of creativity, and features several stunning
storytelling moments. The most economic storytelling
of the year may be in one shot and a sound that morphs
a school bell and something else.
Demme surrounds himself with a skilled crew that
he knows from previous films. Cinematographer Tak
Fujimoto plays with reflections in lighting . Editors
Carol Littleton and Craig McCay create a steady pace
and enforce the feeling of paranoia.
And the acting is dead on. Every time Marco and
Shaw are on screen together, there’s a dazzling
hypnotic feel created by the performances and the
filmmaking. In one scene, Marco visits Shaw in his
campaign headquarters, and the background is the
happenings of the office filtered through purple
lights and distorted glass that feels a bit like
a close-up of a TV screen. The camera hovers sideways
and vertically on both characters’ faces, creating
an uneasy motion to highlight the tension in the
scene.
These elements all create one of the year’s
most exciting thrillers. Even if memories of Frankenheimer’s
film weigh down some of the story choices and place
high expectations, Demme and his cast and crew have
crafted an exciting cinematic work.
jeremy@red-mag.com