t the press
screening of Quebecois
writer/director Denys Arcand’s “The Barbarian Invasions” at
last year’s Cannes Film Festival, the audience
reveled in the film’s wit and cynicism that
covered everything from the Catholic Church to the
Canadian health-care system. At the end of the film,
I was a bit surprised and embarrassed to find tears
in my eyes—until I noticed that the large room
of hardened press members was filled with sniffles.
In a festival filled with many needlessly depressing
films, it was surprising to find that the funniest
and one of the best films was about death.
Ten months later, on Feb. 29, Arcand and his producers
received the Best Foreign Film Oscar for the film,
showing that the academy members weren’t immune
to the film’s charms either. Arcand didn’t
think he’d win when Miramax employees said
they thought he would, “but they know more
about this than I do,” he said. “They’re
there every year and they’re familiar with
the workings of the Academy and they have their spies.”
Speaking on the phone from Montreal a few weeks after
his Oscar win, Arcand said that the only way he could
successfully look at someone’s final days was
to revive the characters from his breakthrough 1986
hit, “The Decline of the American Empire,” which
followed the faculty of a Montreal university’s
history department as they spent a holiday talking
about sex, sex, philosophy and sex.
Before the idea hit, he didn’t know how to
tackle the bleak subject matter. “I struggled
with that for a long, long time. I’d been trying
to write that script for 15 years…on and off,” he
said. “I was always ending up with these dreary
scripts with someone getting ready to die and stuff
like that—nothing that I would care to shoot.
I kept them in a file and could never come up with
anything, until about three years ago when I suddenly
had this idea of going back to my characters from ‘The
Decline of the American Empire.’” Once
the concept hit him, Arcand found it very easy to
write his film.
The dying man is Rémy (Rémy Girard),
a leftist history professor with an appetite for
wine, sex and conversation. He’s now in his
50s and doesn’t have much time left. His ex-wife
Louise (Louise Berryman) calls his estranged son
Sébastien (comedian Stéphane Rousseau)
to come help him die. Sébastien doesn’t
think much of Rémy as a father and Rémy
sees his wealthy son, who works in stock trading
in London, as a symbol of global capitalism who has
never read a book. But Sébastien calls all
of Rémy’s old friends into town to ensure
a cheerful, happy death.
The witty characters bring comedy to the touchy theme. “They’re
very cynical about life and would want to make jokes
until the last moment—would want to smoke pot
and have a drink and talk about the days when they
all slept together in the ’60s and stuff like
that. It allowed laughter and levity,” Arcand
said.
Once he came up with the idea of using his old characters,
Arcand said that he quickly realized that the dying
man had to be Rémy. “Life is totally
unjust and cruel. Very often it’s the people
who love life the most, who enjoy everything and
are having a ball, who are struck first,” he
said. “So I thought it would be more poignant
and dramatically more interesting if it was him.
He’s irascible and he has ups and downs and
stuff with his son. He allowed the widest range of
writing.”
According to Arcand, bringing the characters up to
date was not challenging. He seems to know exactly
how they’ve spent the interval between the
two films. “As soon as I decided, ‘OK,
these are the characters, who’s there, who’s
not there,’ it was very easy. I saw them in
my mind. I knew what happened to them very quickly…I
talked about it with the actors and they all agreed
with me. We had not one disagreement.”
The characters aren’t based on specific people,
so Arcand relied on his quick imagination to create
the backgrounds. “They are basically composites.
They aren’t one person, they sort of represent
this group of people whom I hang out with, and myself
also,” he said.
The actors and Arcand had all seen each other, but
hadn’t all been together for a long time. “Montreal
has a fairly vibrant artistic community, so I’d
seen them in other films, TV shows, opening nights.
They all have varied and very busy careers in theater
or film or television. We were aware of where we
were or what we were doing. I phoned them all when
they had the idea.”
While the film revisits these characters, it stands
alone as its own entity, although the feeling of
revisiting old friends comes through if you’ve
seen the first film. “This is not really a
sequel,” said Arcand, who estimates that half
the people who’ve seen “The Barbarian
Invasions” haven’t seen “The Decline
of the American Empire.” “Obviously,
right off the bat, everyone 30 and below won’t
have heard of the first film and won’t have
a chance to see it. It has to stand alone, I made
that clear. If you saw the other film, that’s
an added plus.”
“In some countries, they’re going to re-issue
a double DVD of both films. I think Miramax is thinking
about it [for U.S. release.]”
Arcand’s direction of the old actors and the
young ones who weren’t in the previous film
didn’t vary a significant amount. “I
wouldn’t say there was a whole lot of difference.
[Rousseau] was a new actor in the sense that he had
only been in one other film and was basically a stand-up
comic, so he had a lot less experience than the others.
Arcand said that Rousseau was looking for a small
dramatic part, but ended up in consideration for
Sébastien because that was the role for which
Arcand was casting. He worked hard over five days
to do a better job with the character, which surprised
Arcand.
Marie-Josée Croze, who plays a heroin-addicted
daughter of one of Rémy’s friends, had
been in many films, including “Maelstrom” and “Ararat” and
was already used to the process. Croze received the
Best Actress award at Cannes, where Arcand received
Best Screenplay. It was the first time one of his
actors won a major award. “I think very often
when my cast deserves such awards, they give it to
me for the script or best director.”
“The other actors were very nice to them both,” Arcand
said. “When you’re not dealing with movie
stars, it becomes a lot easier. These are just good
actors, they’re not stars so they don’t
have egos or agents or managers and whatnot.”
“My feeling is that we are in a mess right now.
But there is always a danger when you nationalize an
entire field like that. At the very beginning, it worked
very well and everybody was well-treated. The thing
is that you create a humongous bureaucracy whenever
you nationalize something. You end up 30 or 40 years
later with a monster on your hands. And it becomes
very, very inefficient. Everybody forgets about the
sick people and how to take care of them. So we’re
going to change that eventually, I’m not sure
exactly how. But I’m certainly not advocating
a return to the old system where rich people can be
very well-taken care of and poor people are not. There
are systems like the French have with vouchers. Nobody
is sure about what should be done, but with any luck
we’ll reform it somehow.”
Arcand also deals with religious issues, visiting
the basement of a Catholic Church that hopes
to sell its own artifacts to raise funds, only
to find that the items have no great monetary value.
As controversy continues to swarm around “The
Passion of the Christ,” Arcand can recall making “Jesus
of Montreal” in 1989. That film used an experimental
group of actors reworking the passion play to take
modern questions into account.
Arcand hasn’t seen “The Passion,” but
has a few thoughts on portraying the life of Jesus. “One
thing that’s certainly positive is I love people
who want to make a statement and put their money
behind the statement. Mel Gibson has done something
he wanted to do and he paid for it with his own money
instead of buying a yacht…On the other side,
we know so little about Palestine 2,000 years ago
that I would never make a film that says, ‘This
is the truth, this is the way it was.’ The
only film that I could make was ‘Jesus of Montreal,’ when
I was following an actor that was trying to recreate
something, but it was a show. I don’t know
how this film is structured, but it has to be presented
as Mel Gibson’s vision of that…Presenting
it as the truth is dangerous.”
Arcand will soon stop talking about his old
films to work on a new one. “I’ve been so busy
pushing this film for the last 10 months. That’s
all I’ve done. But it’s coming to an
end.” After the interview, Arcand left for
Japan to do his final work promoting “The Barbarian
Invasions.” As for the new film, “it’s
going to be a film like all my films, shot here in
Montreal in French with people I know. I’m
going to start writing it in a couple weeks and probably
work on it for a year or a year and a half.”
jeremy@red-mag.com